Archiv der Kategorie: Ingenieur

Dem Ingenieur ist nichts zu schwör.

Luft im Reifen? Im Prinzip egal.

via Jan Heine, Off the beaten path

reiter_road_to_index

Of all our research on tires, the most revolutionary finding is this: Tire pressure has almost no effect on a tire’s speed. We did not believe it at first, either, so we’ve tested it numerous times. It’s been confirmed numerous times, with different methodologies.

The real revolution is not how you use your pump… What has totally changed our riding are the wide, supple tires, which only work because of this new insight.

track_tire_test

First, let’s look at the data. Here is one experiment: We ran three different 25 mm tires (a supple clincher, a supple tubular and a harsher-riding clincher) at pressures from 4.5 and 9 bar (65 and 130 psi). These tests were done on very smooth asphalt (above), a surface where high pressures should offer the greatest advantages.

tire_pressure

There is no relationship between tire pressure and performance in the tested range. (Lower and higher pressures are unsafe to ride.) The graph above shows some variation in power output (lower is better), but there is no trend. The CX tubular rolls fastest at 5.5 bar, the CX clincher is a little faster at 6 bar, while the Rubino is fastest at 9 bar, but almost as fast at 6.5 bar.

Take-home message: Don’t stress about tire pressure!

IMG_0397

This finding has revolutionized our understanding of tires. In the past, we all thought that higher tire pressures made tires roll faster. And that presented a problem for wide tires: A wider tire puts greater loads on the casing than a narrow one. To compensate, you have two choices:

  1. Beef up the casing, which makes the tire less supple and slower.
  2. Lower the pressure, which we thought made the tire slower.

No matter which route you took, then-available science predicted that your wider tire would be slower. It was a catch-22, and for the best performance, you stuck with narrow tires, where you could have a supple casing and high pressure at the same time.

But after realizing that tire pressure doesn’t matter for performance, we were able to explore new possibilities. If lowering the pressure does not make tires slower, you can make supple, wide tires. You run them at lower pressures, and you don’t give up any performance on smooth roads. On rough roads, you gain speed, because the tire (and you) bounce less. And on all roads, you are more comfortable. Instead of a catch-22, you have a win-win-win situation.

tires_comp_650_42

It’s this research that has led professional racers to adopt wider tires. They are up to 25 mm now. (Wider ones won’t fit on their bikes!) For the rest of us, there is no reason not to go wider. I now ride 42 mm tires at 3 bar (43 psi), knowing that they roll as fast as a 25 mm tire at 6 bar (85 psi) – or 9 bar (130 psi), for that matter.

fmb_tread

To get the most benefit out of these lower pressures, you need supple tires. A stiff sidewall takes more energy to flex, so the tire will be slower. And since the sidewall is stiffer, it also will be less comfortable. You could call it a “lose-lose” situation.

Professional racers have known this all along: As much as their equipment has changed over time, they’ve always ridden supple tires. They usually ride hand-made tubulars (above), but for the rest of us, supple, wide clincher tires now make it possible to enjoy the ride and speed of supple tires on any road.

4 Kommentare

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Schaltung für Dummys.

via Cycling Tips

Beyond the big ring: understanding gear ratios and why they matter

There is more to the gearing on your bike than simply the size of your big ring. To get the most out of your gears, it serves to pay attention to the gear ratios produced by the combination of the chainrings with the rear cassette and tailoring them to suit your riding needs. In this post, CTech editor Matt Wikstrom takes a look at how to make sense of gear ratios.

Over the past decade, the number of gears on road bikes has steadily increased. Current groupsets now provide up to 22 gear combinations produced by two front chainrings and 11 rear cogs. That should be enough to contend with just about any terrain, but there is no prescription for perfect gearing. Rather, the individual must determine which gear ratios suit his or her riding style and needs.

GEAR RATIOS

Before the advent of the chain-drive, cyclists determined that the size of the drive-wheel had a profound impact on the speeds that could be achieved. Penny-farthings were not designed with a huge front wheel for aesthetic reasons — the massive circumference allowed higher speeds provided the rider was strong enough to turn the gear.

The introduction of the chain-drive improved the efficiency of the bike because gears could be used. By combining a large cog on the cranks with a small one on the wheel, a single turn of the cranks produced multiple revolutions of the rear wheel, so it could operate just like the massive drive-wheel of a Penny-farthing.

Calculating the number of wheel revolutions produced by a bike’s gearing is simply a matter of determining the ratio of the chainring to the rear sprocket. For example, when a 53T chainring is paired with a 12T cog, it has a ratio 53:12 or 4.42 — that is, the rear wheel rotates 4.42 times for every rotation of the crank. In contrast, a 39x25T selection produces a gear ratio of 1.56.

COMPARING GEAR RATIOS

A road groupset can offer a variety of gear ratios ranging from 1.21 to 4.81 in increments of 0.15-0.40. Rather than trying to understand the significance of gear ratios directly, they can be transformed into more meaningful values in one of two ways.

The first method is to relate the gear ratio to wheel size by multiplying the gear ratio by the diameter of the wheel (Figure 1A). In the case of a road wheel, 27 inches can be used for simplicity although the true diameter of a 700c rim fitted with a 23mm tyre is more like 26.3 inches. The resulting value, gear inches, is the equivalent diameter for a direct-drive wheel (like the front wheel of a Penny-farthing).

Put another way, gear inches provides the diameter of a wheel that has a circumference equivalent to the distance a geared bike will travel with one turn of the cranks and the chosen gear ratio. Thus, riding a high gear ratio such as 53x12T is equivalent to pushing a wheel with a diameter of 119 inches. In contrast, a low gear ratio like 39x25T is equivalent to a 42-inch wheel.

Fig1

The second method, meters of development, is calculated by multiplying the gear ratio by the circumference of the wheel (measured in meters, Figure 1B). This value represents the distance the bike will travel with one crank revolution. Thus 53x12T yields 9.28 meters of development compared to 3.28 meters for 39x25T.

Gear inches (or meters of development) are typically presented in a gearing chart or graphed so that various combinations can be compared (Figure 2). My introduction to gear charts came with BMX racing where they proved invaluable for fine-tuning gear selection to suit the track and weather conditions. Track riders will do the same, swapping the front chainrings and/or the rear sprocket to increase or decrease the gear ratio in increments as required.

The important thing to note is that even minor differences in a ratio (e.g. 1 gear inch) influence how easily the bike can be accelerated or the maximum speed that can be attained.

Fig2

OUT ON THE ROAD

In practice, road riders typically don’t pay much attention to gear ratios due to the abundance of choices available to them. However, there is still considerable value in fine-tuning the range of gear ratios at your disposal to maximise their utility.

I typically see riders deciding on their gearing on the basis of the largest or smallest gear ratios. Some will insist on an 11T cog, however the only time they ever use it is on a steep descent. Such thinking also fuels the debate on the merits of standard (53/39T) versus compact (50/34T) cranksets but the two offer comparable ratios. Indeed, pairing an 11-23T cassette with a compact crankset offers near-identical ratios to a standard crankset coupled with a 12-25T cassette (Figure 3).

Fig3

There is a subtle difference between standard and compact cranks though. As shown in Figure 4 below, the rate at which the ratios increase is greater for standard rings than compact rings. For example, the ratios for the 11-15T cogs increase at an average rate of 7.0 gear inches/tooth for a 53T chainring compared to 6.6 gear inches/T for a 50T chainring. This difference defines the true distinction between the two cranksets by generating a different feel to the gearing at the high end.

Deciding on one over the other is difficult to do without some experience with each, but in general, the lower rate of development offered by compact cranks will suit novices and enthusiasts while racers will prefer the extra grunt offered by standard rings.

Fig4

There is another consideration. Every crank and cassette combination suffers from some redundancy that reduces the number of discrete ratios on offer. A standard crankset paired with an 11-speed 11-25T cassette offers 15 discrete ratios (Figure 5A); by contrast, compact cranks paired with the same cassette afford 16 discrete ratios (Figure 5B). The difference is dictated by the combination rather than the size of the chainrings since 16 discrete ratios can be achieved by pairing an 11-28T cassette with a standard crankset (Figure 5C).

Fig5

PERFECT GEAR RATIOS

So what makes for perfect gearing? Ideally, you want a combination where every upshift and downshift delivers a change in gearing that perfectly suits your legs. Riders that like to spin are likely to prefer small steps while those with more strength and a preference for a slower cadence will want bigger steps.

Thus, the former will enjoy compact rings and/or a straight block (which provides cogs in 1T increments) while bigger chainrings and/or larger increments in the cassette are likely to suit the latter. Bear in mind though, the suitability of the gearing is subject to your form and the terrain.

gears-3

FINAL THOUGHTS AND SUMMARY

Ultimately, gearing is a personal choice and every rider should have the freedom to decide the matter for him/herself, but it will involve some experimentation. Fortunately, groupset manufacturers offer plenty of choices with 11-speed transmissions and compact/semi-compact/standard chainring combinations. The latter is further helped by new crank designs that allow compact, semi-compact, and standard chainring combinations to be interchanged.

It is futile judging the value of a particular chainring and cassette pairing on the basis of a single ratio. A 53T chainring will always offer a higher gear ratio than a compact 50T chainring but the two offer different rates of development, which ultimately dictates how the gearing evolves over the range of the cassette. At the same time, devoting some consideration to the overlap in gear ratios between the big and small chainrings may extend the versatility of the gearing.

gears-6

It won’t be long before bike computers are paired with electronic groupsets to collect data on how much time is spent using each gear ratio. At the same time, there is also the prospect of sequential shifting for road groupsets. Perhaps these and other innovations will usher in a new era of intelligent gearing?

What sort of gearing do you prefer? Compact or standard crank? Or perhaps a mid-compact? Why have you got the gearing setup you’ve currently got? Is it simply about the range of gears for you, or something more?

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Schnelle Räder. Leichte Räder.

via Velonews

Editor’s Note: This excerpt is adapted from the book FASTER: Demystifying the Science of Triathlon Speed by Jim Gourley and republished with permission from VeloPress. Learn more about the science of triathlon at freetrispeed.com.

Let’s clear something up. There is no such thing as a “fast bike.” Bikes are neither fast nor slow. Bikes are shiny or expensive. Bikes have a lot of mass or a little. Without a rider, they are stationary. Physics holds a bike in place until you get on it and start pedaling. Even then the bike may not necessarily be fast. Of all the equipment on your bike, your legs are the most critical component. There are plenty of nice bikes on the road that are being ridden slowly.

But more insidious than inaccurate vocabulary is a simple overestimation of how much bike weight matters for most riding.

In FASTER, I show the math that explains why just a degree or two of incline makes riding a bike feel so much harder. Riding up a hill, it may seem more important than ever to dump any and all extra mass we can from our bikes. That’s the allure of a carbon fiber bottle cage, an upgrade to carbon fiber cranks, handlebars, stem, carbon saddle rails, or wheel spokes. Five grams here, 10 grams there, it all adds up, right? Pretty soon, you’re 500 grams lighter. That’s half a kilogram!

True. But such upgrades could easily total $500 or more, which is also half a grand. Is it worth it?

Not exactly.

A good approximate difference between an entry-level aluminum bike with a decent set of components and a top-of-the-line carbon model with some of the lightest components on the market is just shy of 3.25 pounds.

Was the weight loss worth it?

Let’s find out. Take a hypothetical rider and have her ride two bikes up a hill at the same speed. The first bike weighs 15 pounds and the second bike will shave off the 3.21 pounds to weigh in at 11.79 pounds. For each test, we’ll have her ride at 15 mph. Everything is constant, except for the bike, so what we ought to see is a reduction in the power required to get up the hill. That’s the real test of your savings.

Refer to the second image, above, for a graph of the results.

If you’re having trouble telling what the difference is, save yourself the eyestrain, because there isn’t much — that’s the message.

But pro athletes use the lightest equipment they can, so there must be something to it, right?

Remember that professional athletes operate in an entirely different environment than the rest of us. They are all very close to each other in terms of fitness, and they are also all very close to being the absolute best a human being can be.

Beyond that, our result also makes intuitive sense: 3.21 pounds is just over 2 percent of the total weight of our 150-pound cyclist and 15-pound bike. Ten watts is 2 percent of the 500-watt power requirement to maintain speed up a 10 percent grade. Because the weight-to-power savings ratio is linear, we should expect that one-to-one relationship.

The implication is a bitter pill, though. If you want to reduce the power requirement by 1 percent, you have to reduce the total mass that’s moving up the hill by 1 percent. And because you’re moving both your body and the bike up the hill, a measly 1 percent equates to a whole lot of grams before you see returns on your carbon investment.

In short, you’re much better off upgrading your legs and dropping body fat through proper training and diet. In fact, losing unnecessary weight would have a dual impact on your power and speed. As weight decreases, the amount of power required to maintain a certain speed will also decrease. At the same time, the amount of power you are capable of generating should actually increase. This is because oxygen uptake is related to body mass and improves as fat is lost.

Wattage vs. time

If the power argument doesn’t quite satisfy you, we can look at it another way. Let’s answer the question you really care about: How much faster does it make me? After all, you win races by saving time, not watts. Let’s see what will happen when our hypothetical rider rides bikes of varying weight up different hills. We’ll hold power at a constant 200 watts and have her ride up a 1-mile climb at seven different grades (1–7 percent).

Let’s look at the difference between 15-, 16-, 17-, and 18-pound bikes, with the 18-pound bike serving as the baseline. Because of the complexity involved, we’ll eliminate air resistance and analyze the impact of weight reduction only. How much time do we save?

A graph of the results is in the third image above.

Read it and weep, weight watchers.

Look at the far right of the graph. Take 3 pounds off your bike, pedal at a constant rate of 200 watts, and you’ll get to the top of a 7 percent climb a whole 7.5 seconds ahead of the competition. A 1-pound advantage only puts you ahead by 2.5 seconds. Over the course of an hours-long race, a few seconds per climb is not a significant advantage.

Keep in mind that the advantage only holds when the climbs are long and steep. Courses with fewer and shorter ascents will keep the difference small.
Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2014/08/news/bike-weight-myth-fast-bikes_339880#5Z4PyRiZJd6WOBRQ.99

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Speichen Windup

Typisches Einspeichproblem und eine gute Lösung dafür.

via Velo News

Es gibt von Velo News eine ganze Reihe von hilfreichen Videos , einige besser, andre schlechter.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Presta zu Autoventil.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Ein Rohr.. Zwei bis vier Biegungen.

bar_design

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

66 seconds. with Velocity.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

Optimizing Tire Tread

Nach meiner etwas harschen Kritik an Jan Heines Beitrag zum Thema „Je suis Charlie“ als Ausgleich einer der wirklichen guten Beiträge aus seinem Blog „off the beatne path“ zum Thema Radreifen.

via off the beaten path

Compass_tread_pattern

Most tire manufacturers agree that supple sidewalls and a thin tread make a tire fast, but the role of the tread pattern remains poorly understood. Most modern tires have either a completely smooth tread (slicks) or a coarse tread pattern similar to car tires. Many high-performance tires are smooth with just a few large sipes. None of these tread patterns are optimized.

Car tires have tread mostly to prevent hydroplaning. With their wide, square profile, a layer of water can form between tire and road surface. The tread pattern forms channels so the water can be pushed out of the tire/road interface.

Bicycle tires do not hydroplane. Their contact patch is too small and too round for that. This means that car-inspired tread patterns are not necessary on bicycle tires. Does this mean that no tread pattern at all – a slick tire – is best? Any tread pattern reduces the amount of rubber on the road surface… In the lab, it does work that way: Slick tires grip best on smooth steel drums.

Real roads are not as smooth as steel drums. An optimized tire tread interlocks with the irregularities of the road surface to provide more grip than the pure friction between asphalt and rubber. This is especially noticeable in wet conditions, when the coefficient of friction is reduced by half, yet you can corner with about 70-80% of the speed you use on dry roads. (Unless the road surface is greasy…)

The ideal tire tread has as many interlocking points with the road surface as possible. The “file tread” found on many classic racing tires does this. The ribs are angled so they don’t deflect under the loads of cornering or braking.

Why do race cars use slick tires, and not a file tread? The reason is simple: It would be abraded the first time the car accelerates. However, bicycle tires don’t wear significantly on their shoulders – the part that touches the ground when you corner hard – so we can use a tread pattern that is optimized for grip without worrying about wear.

Each Compass tires has three distinct tread patterns, each designed for a specific purpose.

  • Center: Fine ribs serve as wear indicators. When the lines disappear, the tire is about half-worn. (The tread of our narrower tires is not wide enough for ribs, so small dots are used instead.)
  • Shoulders: When the bike leans over as you corner, the tire rolls on it shoulders. A chevron or “fine file” tread pattern optimized grip.
  • Edges: This part never touches the road (unless you crash). They serve only to protect the casing from punctures, so they don’t need any tread.

TireProfile-hi

Supple casings make tires faster, but a supple casing is of little use when it’s covered by thick tread rubber. The fastest tire would have just a minimal layer of tread rubber, and many “event” tires are made that way. Unfortunately, that means that they don’t have much rubber to wear down until they are too thin to use. At Compass Bicycles, we call these tires “pre-worn”.

Compass tires have a slightly thicker tread in the center. A little more material there doubles or even triples the life of your tire, while adding minimal weight and resistance. (On our widest 650B x 42 mm tire, the added tread weighs less than 50 grams.) Once you have ridden the tires for a few thousand miles, they’ll be as light as the “event tires”.

On the shoulders and edges, the tread does not wear. So we made it much thinner to keep the tire supple and reduce its weight. The tread extends far enough down the sidewall that the casing is protect when seen from above. Extending the tread further adds little protection, but makes the tire less supple and thus less comfortable and slower.

tires_comp_650_42

Another important factor is the tread rubber. This is an area where incredible progress has been made in recent decades. In the past, you could either have good grip or good durability. I used to ride Michelin’s Hi-Lite tires, which gripped well, but rarely lasted even 1000 miles (1600 km).

Compass tires use Panaracer’s best tread rubber, which is amazing. Our tires are among the grippiest you can find, yet I just got an e-mail from a 230-pound rider who got 3786 miles (6093 km) out of a set of our 26 mm-wide Cayuse Pass tires. The wider tires spread the wear over more rubber, so they last significantly longer. (Don’t try to set wear records, but replace your tires once they get thin. The risk of flats, or worse, blowouts, is not worth getting an extra few hundred miles out of a worn tire.)

Tread color is another important consideration. Modern colored treads no longer are the “death traps” they used to be, but especially in wet conditions, the grip of tires with colored treads – including the Grand Bois Hetres we sell – is not quite as good as that of black treads. That is why we offer only black tread.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Ingenieur, Mob

3D gedruckter Sattel.

Ohne rot zu werden, würde ich gerne hier behaupten, dass ich seit zehn Jahren davon überzeugt bin, dass die 3D Drucktechnik unser Leben nachhaltig beeinflussen wird. 

Vor 50 Jahren hatte man eine Schreibmaschine und Kohlepapier mit Durchschlägen, vor 40 Jahren dann sogenannte „Matrizen“ um Referate in der Schule zu kopieren, vor 30 Jahren dann endlich Schwarz-weiß Kopierer (zunächst mit flüssigen und dann mit fester „Tinte“), dann kamen die ersten Farbkopierer und Farbdrucker in Mode und jetzt 3D Drucker. Die Entwicklung ist dabei immer ähnlich, was zunächst eine teure. spezialisierte Anwednung für die INdustrie ist wird nach und nach billiger, komfortabeler und für Konsumenten kaufbar. Jedes Mal gibt es auch Bedenken und zehn Jahre später fragt man sich „Ehrlich – wegen der Sache sollte das nichts geben?“ Bei den 3-D Druckern ist es das Drucken von Waffen, was diese Geräte so brisant macht, oder machen soll. Sicher. Auf dem Internet gibt es uach prima Bastelanleitungen für Bomben – Stecker raus aus dem Internet.

3D Drucker werden nun zunehmend nicht nur im Prototyping sondern auch in der Serienfertigung von Produkten eingesetzt. Ich denke, wir machen uns noch falsche Vorstellungen davon, wie 3D Printer Besitz von unserem Leben ergreifen werden. Im Gegensatz zu, sagen wir einmal LED Lampen, gibt es nichts (Glühbirnen), was sie eins zu eins ersetzen werden. Ich könnte mir aber vorstellen, dass eine Menge Dinge in 3D Druckzentren in Städten dezentral angefertigt werden; damit werden Transportkosten gespart. Aber ich denke nicht. das dies der grösste Vorteil von 3D Druckern ist. Der größte Vorteil ist m.E. die Individualisierung von Gütern. Ich kaufe nicht mehr etwas aus dem Regal, das am Ende eines Fließbandes als Standard aus einer Fabrik kommt; ich drücke ein paar Tasten auf dem PC und wähle unter hunderten von Komibinationen die, die ich mir dann selbst vor Ort produziere. Sagen wir mal: Ein paar Turnschuhe.

Hier ein Beispiel von Giant.

PDDnet.com is reporting that Giant Bicycles has started using 3D printing for bicycle saddles, and it’s not just for prototyping – the process is becoming part of their production process, too!Using two different processes, they’re able to quickly create rideable prototypes to test many variations and then take the exact shapes into production. First, they’re using SLS (Selective Laser Sintering) to turn nylon powder into the saddle shells. The result is virtually identical to the shells of production saddles, so Giant knows essentially what the final product will feel like throughout testing.Then, they use SLA (another process that UV laserifies a resin into a solid) to create molds for the shells and padding that would be used in production. Compared to traditional tooling and molds, this process is far cheaper and faster. Check the full article with comments from Giant’s lead industrial designer Daniel Lentz here. We’re thinking it can’t be long before someone uses 3D metal printing similar to Charge Bikes’ dropouts to test rail shapes.

Und noch ein Artikel dazu:

3D Printing is a manufacturing process taking some precedence in the news, both in hype and circumstance. Giant has utilized the technology in the latest iteration of their saddles

If you don’t live in a parallel universe, then you’ve probably heard about 3D Printing. Lately, the technology has filled the news with toys, trinkets, and failures. But the technology does a lot more than print Yoda’s sexy giant ears.

Giant has been using 3D printing technologies to prototype, but also to mold functioning saddles, and what they’re doing has implications for all venues of manufacturing, whether you’re a hobbyist or a huge company. For its latest iteration of seats, Giant used Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) and Stereolithography (SLA) from online 3D Printing service provider ZoomRP.com during early design iterations and actual functioning prototypes.

Prototyping began with Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) utilizing ZoomRP’s SLS White material. SLS creates parts in a deep bed of powdered Nylon. A CO2 laser sinters (or melts) the design and the powder bed drops down in minute increments until, layer by layer, the design manifests itself in the powder. The part is then removed from the powder in much the same way archeologists brush away dirt from a hidden fossil. “We’ve found that the Nylon powder used with Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) mimics the base of the bike saddle,” explained Daniel Lentz Lead Industrial Designer: Components at Giant. “That’s the beauty of ordering SLS parts; they simulate the final product. We modify the model, print, and take the SLS prototypes out for a ride, allowiing us to feel and test the final product before actually having the final product.”

Lentz and his team take the 3D Printed SLS bases out for a ride to test the positioning of their latest models. Knowing SLS will feel like the final production saddle base gives them confidence in making final descisions before moving into production. And let’s face it, the saddle is one of the most personalized parts of your bike; it’s got to be just right, or, as my cycling friends like to say, it can feel like you’re wearing the wrong size of pants (a rather apt description).

The technology available to Lentz’s team continues to push the manufacturing and even designing of saddles, and the way it feels to ride.“With every new iteration of saddle prototype that we create, we include shape adjustments to both the base and foam that we test extensively.  These adjustments can be as subtle as intricate form adjustments and slight foam thickness variations and we may go through a number of different prototypes with any new design,” explained Lentz. “3D Printing allows us to hone in the precise shape and performance in the final product that will offer our customers a more comfortable and confident ride.”

The saddle is narrow enough so chaffing is less of an issue for the off road cyclist, but also incorporates slight curvature with enough padding to make it fairly comfortable for the road biker as well. After finalizing the design in SLS, Lentz’s team moved to another 3D printing process—the oldest one in the books—Stereolithography (SLA).

SLA works with a huge vat of liquid resin and a UV laser. The laser maps out the shape of the product upon the liquid, curing the resin layer by layer. “SLA is used to print the mold for the seat. Within the SLA mold, we pour polyurethane and actually mold the board here in our office,” explained Lentz. “Form and comfort for new saddles is important. We see real benefits in the precise and custom forms achievable through 3D Printing processes, and in future possible shapes.”

Using a 3D Printed part for a mold is both cost and time effective; traditional methods of tooling and machining are time consuming and often far more costly. These processes allowed Lentz’s team to ride, test, and manufacture functioning prototypes with exact design features manifested in just days. Lentz’s team was able to personalize the saddles with the design throughout the prototyping process. That personalization informed them of the comfort and fit of the saddle on a level that directly translates to what you might be taking out for your next ride.

via bike rumour

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter 2013, Ingenieur, Mob

Schneller. Noch schneller.

Obree's "Beastie". Photo credit http://www.humansinvent.com

2013 World Human Powered Speed Challenge at Battle Mountain, Nevada.

Kurzer Bericht hier von Bicycle Design hier als noch nichts entschieden war mit vielen Links. Nun gibt es einen neuen Weltrekord mit fast 134 km/hr durch das holländische Velox3 Team. Bericht auf Bike Radar.

Pilot rider sebastiaan bowier poses with the world's fastest bike, the velo x3: pilot rider sebastiaan bowier poses with the world's fastest bike, the velo x3

Ein Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter 2013, Ingenieur, Mob